Reordering management education: Putting analytics before leadership theory

Management education is undergoing a fundamental reset. As businesses become increasingly data-driven, the profile of an effective leader is changing in ways traditional curricula have been slow to recognise. Today’s managers are expected to interpret dashboards as confidently as they inspire teams, question algorithms as critically as they challenge assumptions, and make decisions grounded in evidence rather than instinct alone. Yet, in many classrooms, leadership theory is still taught in isolation before learners have developed the analytical fluency required to understand the realities they will eventually lead. This sequencing problem matters. Leadership without data literacy risks becoming aspirational rhetoric rather than effective action. In a world where every strategic decision is influenced by metrics, customer acquisition costs, churn rates, supply-chain efficiency, risk models, and predictive forecasts, leaders who cannot read, interpret, and question data are operating at a disadvantage from day one. The new language of business is data Across industries, data has become the common language that connects strategy, operations, and execution. Marketing leaders are evaluated on attribution models and lifetime value. Operations heads rely on predictive analytics to manage inventory and logistics. Finance teams increasingly use real-time data to guide capital allocation. Even human resources now depend on analytics to assess productivity, engagement, and workforce planning. When management graduates enter such environments without a working understanding of analytics, they are forced to rely on specialists for interpretation. This dependency limits their ability to ask the right questions, challenge assumptions, or anticipate second-order consequences. True leadership requires agency, and agency begins with comprehension. Data fluency gives future leaders the confidence to engage meaningfully in decision-making rather than merely endorsing recommendations they do not fully understand. Why leadership theory alone is no longer enough Leadership theories, such as transformational leadership, situational leadership, and servant leadership, offer valuable frameworks for understanding human behaviour and organisational dynamics. However, when introduced before analytical grounding, they risk becoming abstract ideals disconnected from business reality. Learners may understand how to motivate teams but struggle to evaluate whether a strategy is working, why performance is slipping, or where resources should be reallocated. Modern leadership is as much about trade-offs as it is about vision. Deciding whether to prioritise growth or profitability, automation or employment, speed or accuracy requires the ability to interpret data under uncertainty. Without this capability, leadership becomes reactive rather than strategic. Data does not replace judgment, but it sharpens it. From intuition-led to evidence-informed leadership Historically, many business decisions were driven by experience and intuition. While these qualities still matter, the scale and speed of today’s markets demand evidence-informed leadership. Algorithms can process patterns far beyond human capacity, but they cannot contextualise outcomes or make ethical choices. That responsibility rests with leaders who understand both the numbers and their implications. Management education must therefore teach learners how to work alongside data, how to frame the right questions, identify biases in datasets, and recognise the limitations of models. This is not about turning every manager into a data scientist, but about ensuring that future...

Preview: ~500 words