📱

Read on Your E-Reader

Thousands of readers get articles like this delivered straight to their e-reader. Works with Kindle, Boox, and any device that syncs with Google Drive or Dropbox.

Learn More

This is a preview. The full article is published at vox.com.

Grok’s nonconsensual porn problem is part of a long, gross legacy

Grok’s nonconsensual porn problem is part of a long, gross legacy

By Constance GradyVox

For the past few weeks, Elon Musk’s Grok AI bot has been generating pornographic images of women and underage girls, without their consent, at an astounding rate. A recent Bloomberg analysis found that Grok creates 6,700 such images per hour, or more than one per minute. On Friday, X at last put some minor guardrails on the tool, with a new policy that only paying subscribers can use Grok to generate or alter images . On the standalone Grok app, however, anyone can prompt Grok to generate new images , meaning the deepfaked porn continues. Grok’s nonconsensual porn problem is part of a long, gross legacy Elon Musk claims tech needs a “spicy mode” to dominate. Is he right? Constance Grady is a senior correspondent on the Culture team for Vox, where since 2016 she has covered books, publishing, gender, celebrity analysis, and theater. Grok has long been one of the more suggestive of the major AI models , with “spicy” and “sexy” settings that can be toggled on and off. While employees have warned that the bot is being used to generate child sex abuse materials , Musk has remained committed to the idea that Grok would be the sexiest AI model. On X, Musk has defended the choice on business grounds , citing the famous tale of how VHS beat Betamax in the 1980s after the porn industry put its weight behind VHS , with its larger storage capacity. “VHS won in the end,” Musk posted, “in part because they allowed spicy mode 😉.” There is a certain amount of truth to Musk’s take. The porn industry tends to reward early adopters, and the money to be made in porn means that it has impressive leverage when it comes to choosing between two competing and incompatible forms of technology. Yet the idea that porn as an industry, neutral and amorphous, settles tech wars doesn’t show us the whole truth. It would be more accurate to say that the technologies we use to generate and share images are, more often than not, shaped by people distributing images of women’s bodies - often with dubious consent from the women themselves. In that sense, Grok’s abilities are par for the course. Porn didn’t only help VHS win over Betamax. The industry has also been linked to the mainstreaming of Super 8 film (easy and convenient for amateur filmmakers), the development of streaming video (private and easily accessible), the development of web payments (comes with paywalled streaming video), the development of web analytics (good for the complex business transactions of adult streaming), and the victory of Blu-ray over HD DVD. (Like VHS, Blu-rays held a lot more data than its competitors, which is especially attractive in the porn market.) Then there were the systems of image distribution that developed outside of porn as an industry. A surprising amount of them revolved around people trying to share sexualized images of women’s bodies as quickly as possible - only in these cases, the people...

Preview: ~500 words

Continue reading at Vox

Read Full Article

More from Vox

Subscribe to get new articles from this feed on your e-reader.

View feed

This preview is provided for discovery purposes. Read the full article at vox.com. LibSpace is not affiliated with Vox.

Grok’s nonconsensual porn problem is part of a long, gross legacy | Read on Kindle | LibSpace